I think we should separately design a function for this ... On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 5:36:25 AM UTC+5:30, Muhammed abdul Quadir owais wrote: > > IMO , it could be done in 2 ways > 1, We could just represent this in matrix form (lists in lists) and > ultimately the solution of each dimension in each matrix . > 2. Extend the set by comma's and have the solutions after each comma as > in figure.... > > > [image: Screen Shot 2020-03-10 at 5.33.52 AM.png] > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 1:56:23 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 11:53 PM Muhammed abdul Quadir owais >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > parallel with building respective set infrastructure( could be image >> set or multidimentional image set according to the nature of solution >> obtained ) can be established . >> >> I would discuss this point in more depth. I think a large reason why >> multivariate solvers aren't implemented in solveset yet is that it >> isn't clear how to represent the solutions. >> >> Aaron Meurer >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/2e14c198-59b3-48b9-a013-759c7ed833a4%40googlegroups.com.
