I think the work is also done on set infrastructure with nonlinsolve, linsolve, and solve_decompostion there's no further requirement for this also , if necessary to get more vivid solutions for multivariate should work on this, as I proposed the 2 ways of it ... I want to have opinion on this, for more better solution or any dark sides of doing the way I proposed it..
Looking forward for reply from sympy community :) On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 6:32:21 AM UTC+5:30, Muhammed abdul Quadir owais wrote: > > > I think we should separately design a function for this ... > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 5:36:25 AM UTC+5:30, Muhammed abdul Quadir > owais wrote: >> >> IMO , it could be done in 2 ways >> 1, We could just represent this in matrix form (lists in lists) and >> ultimately the solution of each dimension in each matrix . >> 2. Extend the set by comma's and have the solutions after each comma as >> in figure.... >> >> >> [image: Screen Shot 2020-03-10 at 5.33.52 AM.png] >> >> On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 1:56:23 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 11:53 PM Muhammed abdul Quadir owais >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > parallel with building respective set infrastructure( could be image >>> set or multidimentional image set according to the nature of solution >>> obtained ) can be established . >>> >>> I would discuss this point in more depth. I think a large reason why >>> multivariate solvers aren't implemented in solveset yet is that it >>> isn't clear how to represent the solutions. >>> >>> Aaron Meurer >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/b5be0f0b-decb-4d6f-abf5-205e3766aec3%40googlegroups.com.
