On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 6:39:45 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > From the page: "also, Sage attaches _sage_ methods to various SymPy > classes, which provide the opposite conversion." > > SymPy also has various _sage_ methods, but mainly only in the core. > Should we keep these in SymPy? It sounds like you are already adding a > bunch of your own, so maybe we should just move them all to the sage > codebase. We could also move them all to the SymPy codebase too, if > that sounds more preferable. I would assume having them in Sage is > better >
Our file adding the methods apparently has been in Sage since Sage 8.1 (2017), https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24006, which references https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/13430 I would think that, unless more _sage_ methods have been added on the SymPy side, the _sage_ methods can just be removed from SymPy. There is no point trying to support Sage <= 8.0; because these old versions did not support Python 3 as far as I know. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/34e496a5-1218-477a-8577-7fce0db38807n%40googlegroups.com.
