On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 23:55, Jeremy Monat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Google searches seem like a "a reasonable metric for what's relevant to > users." I posted the top 1000 Google search terms for a year's worth of > searches.
I agree to some extent but here we are talking about the reference API rather than guides etc which means we can organise it to educate users about the features that SymPy has rather than just try to draw the right clicks. I actually think that a lot of the time I know what users want more than they do, or in other words they are searching for the wrong solution to their problem. We can try to approach this in different ways but I'm interested to hear from people who are making good use of SymPy whether they feel that something is missing or not prominent enough in the docs. Another part of this is just making it clear to users what SymPy can do. The organisation of the docs should make that clear. SymPy has significant capabilities to solve problems involving polynomials. Those capabilities exceed many other parts of SymPy by *miles* but yet are very much unemphasised by the docs. -- Oscar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAHVvXxSCQdZa01JYJEAZv0z8c%3DOQ%3D4meWMMYv9_cX8UBg8B3qA%40mail.gmail.com.
