Hi Francesco, Thank you for the reply. How should I progress in this project? I have several issues encountered when I am going through the matchpy repository, where would I raise those issues.
On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 3:49:09 PM UTC+5:30 Francesco Bonazzi wrote: > The idea that I have in mind requires forking the MatchPy library. If we > can find a way to modify the tree-traversal algorithms in MatchPy in order > not to depend on type checks, we will make MatchPy's integration into SymPy > much easier. > > On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 1:17:17 a.m. UTC+1 [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi, >> Even though, I have engaged with few chats I thought to introduce me >> first. I am Samith Karunathilake, a third year undergraduate from >> University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. I have an interest on contributing for >> the Sympy for GSOC 2024. As for now I have baisc understanding about few >> areas, *sympy.series*, *matchpy_connector* and *parse_mathematica*. >> >> Here are the few methods that I identified about matchpy restructuring. >> Since, at the moment it uses an Expression node as the root node and we >> can redefine it and introduce some methods to check whether it is a >> instance of wildcard or an operation. >> Through that we can change the tree traversal method without bothering >> about the implementation of the Wild Card and Operations. >> If Francesco Bonazzi, or any potential mentor can give their idea on this >> thread, it would be much helpful. I will post more about this project as a >> reply for this thread. >> >> Thanks in advance for your collaboration. >> Samith Karunathilake. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/3985368b-4d77-4776-957b-3de4859097afn%40googlegroups.com.
