An article yesterday in the register talking about AI spam PRs on GitHub:
https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/03/github_kill_switch_pull_requests_ai/

GitHub are apparently looking into whether anything can be done to improve this:
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/185387

The article quotes someone summarizing the problems. I agree with all
of these points:

- Review trust model is broken: reviewers can no longer assume authors
understand or wrote the code they submit.
- AI-generated PRs can look structurally "fine" but be logically
wrong, unsafe, or interact with systems the reviewer doesn't fully
know.
- Line-by-line review is still mandatory for shipped code, but does
not scale with large AI-assisted or agentic PRs.
- Maintainers are uncomfortable approving PRs they don't fully
understand, yet AI makes it easy to submit large changes without deep
understanding.
- Increased cognitive load: reviewers must now evaluate both the code
and whether the author understands it.
- Review burden is higher than pre-AI, not lower.

The article quotes someone saying
"""
I'm generally happy to help curious people in issues and guide them
towards contributions/solutions in the spirit of social coding," he
wrote. "But when there is no widespread lack of disclosure of LLM use
and increasingly automated use – it basically turns people like myself
into unknowing AI prompters. That's insane, and is leading to a huge
erosion of social trust.
"""
That's basically how I feel about the situation although I would go
further. Reviewing these PRs is not like being an AI prompter because
the human using the AI behaves effectively like a broken AI. You would
get better, more trustworthy results much more quickly if you were
prompting the AI directly yourself.

--
Oscar

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAHVvXxTW%2BAbzhA4UyObFzogTY7EJqrjFEcvVFCy3u_fE-KK8xA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to