> if you have used the synaser unit to talk to a gsm modem using AT > commands you may have noticed that the existing functions and > procedures only handle those AT commands to which the modem responds > with 'OK' or 'ERROR'. This works fine most of the time, however if you > want to send SMS messages there is a problem since the response you > get from the 'AT+CMGS="...phone number..."' command is '> ', at which > point the modem expects you to type the message content and submit > CTRL^Z. The '> ' response is not expected by synaser and eventually > the AT command times out. I did a little digging on the code and I > think I know where I should try to make changes, but I was wondering > if anyone else has solved this before me. If you have, please let me > know.
Why mu must use Atcommand method? You can implement any communication by standard send* and recv* calls. See how trivially is ATCommand implemented and implement your code on similar way. -- Lukas Gebauer. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://synapse.ararat.cz/ - Ararat Synapse - TCP/IP Lib. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
