Re: Initializing mediators

[Asankha C. Perera]

+1 for init() and shutdown().. However...Chathura, could you please explain what type of information that you would want to share among the various instances of a mediator.. just to sanity check your requirement and what you want to achieve asankha Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: +1, except for the name closedown() .. how about init() and shutdown()? Sanjiva. On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:42 +0530, Ruwan Linton wrote: +1 I think we need both init() and closedown() methods declared in the mediator interface..... Ruwan On 11/6/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually I was thinking about this the other day. We also need a closedown if we add an init(). Paul On 11/6/06, Chathura Ekanayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am writing a new mediator and I want to access some variables from all > instances of that mediator. > So I think the best way is to instantiates and add those objects to the > ConfigurationContext at start up. > > But AFAIK currently there is no method to initialize mediators. It would be > useful if we can have an "init" method in mediators > which will be called by Sysnapse at start up. And the ConfigurationContext > can be passed into this method, so that all > the initialization logic can be performed within it. > > Please give your ideas about this... > > Regards, > Chathura. > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]