Help me understand for what use case a precise count is relevant. Andreas
Sent from Mobile. On Jul 26, 2013, at 17:39, Richard Newman <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree: repeating the mistakes of Weave is the biggest enemy here. And > one of those mistakes was thinking that "good enough" was good enough, when > it manifestly was not, at any level of abstraction. We should not be trading > the very basics of correctness for the possibility of a closer ship date. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andreas Gal" <[email protected]> > To: "Richard Newman" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Lloyd Hilaiel" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 5:29:48 PM > Subject: Re: whats the key anyway? > > There are many different ways to do this. And it simply doesn't matter > which one we chose. Losing a usage count is irrelevant. As long we are > reasonably counting, that's perfectly fine. Complexity is our biggest > enemy here. Precision is not a design goal. Fast delivery of a > solution that reasonably approximates consistency is. > > Andreas _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
