----- Original Message -----

> There is so much wrong with your analysis that I don't know where to start.
> Fortunately, its also so far out of scope that I don't have to. Your
> perspective is appreciated, but we have made certain decisions at this
> point, and we will not revisit them. Until we get different guidance, the
> use cases are what they are, and the goal of getting an MVP to market is
> set. If you disagree with that strategy, we will have to agree to disagree,
> but I will still need your full support with implementing it. If you would
> like to help with resolving remaining technical detail issues, please do so
> by listing concrete, relevant, realistic use cases. General statements of
> disagreement are not useful.

Be careful falling back on the high-level MVP as a crutch to avoid making hard 
decisions. The MVP does not contain low level details on consistency and 
conflict resolution. It shouldn't. The MVP does have a section on "Performance 
and Stability" and that section does make some statements about users 
"expecting zero data loss." 

I agree with you about getting a list of concrete failure cases. I think that 
work has started. I also have no desire to see history repeated. 

We'll get links to the success and failure cases available as soon as they 
start appearing. 
_______________________________________________
Sync-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev

Reply via email to