On 11/30/07, Dr J A Gow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 17:15 +0000, John Carr wrote:
>
> >
> > Sounds good. If its relatively light on dependencies I think a conduit
> > backend would be born very quickly :-) As you know I will be about
> > quite a bit :-D
>
> Dependencies shouldn't be too much of a problem - the mail protocols
> themselves would be buried in the backend (imap - imap plugin and so
> on). The front end should only be dependent on the usual Python server
> stuff and a patched wbxml (it won't need rapi2 or even libsynce).
> Although C/C++ is my more natural environment :) I hope to keep the push
> server as pure Python so it should be relatively straightforward to
> develop backends.
>
> John.
Awesome \o/ Hopefully we can do something about wbxml too. Though i'm
stalled on that till i dare sync my phone to collect some test data :P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
