On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 02:35 -0500, Scott Gifford wrote: > > vdccm: It seems to me that the only advantage of vdccm is its multiple > > device support. Therefore, I am suggesting dropping vdccm as a proper > > SynCE module. I'm not saying it should be deleted from SVN, but just > > left out of releases. Thoughts? > > For those who need this it is a really important feature, and it would > be a shame to lose it to bitrot if vdccm were removed. > > Is there a great deal involved in making odccm support multiple > devices? > > ----Scott.
Ah Scott, good timing, you just reminded me of something I had to do ! I took a look at your changes to synce-serial, good stuff, fiddled a bit to get them into the current tree, and completely forgot to do anything else. So I've just committed it. Haven't tried multiple devices because I only have 1, but I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work, and it's worth it just from the extra sophistication. Anyone who wants to have a look but can't find it in svn, it's in branches/legacy/serial. I would move it into trunk but want to see how hal-dccm goes first. Anyway, Scott, I'm assuming your question relates only to pre WM5 devices, yes ? In that case, theoretically, odccm should already support multiple devices. Anyone want to be a guinea pig, try the new serial scripts, give both vdccm and odccm a go and let us know. Ta Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
