On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:52 +0000, Mark Ellis wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 09:10 -0500, Richard Alimi wrote: > > > Cool. I'm wondering what the version number we should use for the > > > snapshot > > > then. Since this is sort of a "pre-0.11.0" release, I guess the ebuild > > > should have the version number "0.10.0_pre<SVN_REVISION>". That seems to > > > be what they are doing for the mythtv SVN snapshots anyways. Any other > > > ideas? > > > > Sorry, that should have read "0.11.0_pre<SVN_REVISION>" ... > > > > For my debs I use 0.10.0.svn<checkout date YYYYMMDD>, makes them run > nicely in sequential order after the release.
I would like to name it either synce-0.11_preYYYYMMDD.ebuild where YYYYMMDD is the day the snapshot was taken (if the synce bigwigs like the pre-release sound) OR synce-0.10.0_pYYYYMMDD.ebuild (my personal favourite). Note the 0.11_pre versus 0.10.0_p This is according to http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1#doc_chap3_sect5 so that portage can sort out which is newer and older. I chose 0.11 and not 0.11.0 because of (David's?) comments earlier on versions / roadmap / etc. thanks! -- Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> Used staples are good with SOY SAUCE! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
