On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Alimi wrote:

> As for Gentoo ebuilds, what I had done was configure my /etc/make.conf with a 
> local overlay.  Then before committing changes to SVN I could be sure that 
> the build worked and all the manifets/digests were correct and that things 
> were basically working.  I'm guessing you've been doing something similar to 
> this already though :)

yep :)

> I seem to recall seeing QA tools that were done by Gentoo developers for 
> ebuilds, but I haven't used them.

repoman

>   I guess I woudln't be surprised if they 
> found problems with our current set of ebuilds :)

*heh* only over 100 QA issues...  repoman is really fussy - but then he
has to be with over 25000 ebuilds in the official tree...

>   If its possible to 
> incorporate those QA tools, that would be pretty nice, but I don't seem to 
> see that as a large priority since we don't have too many ebuilds (in 
> comparison to the entire Portage tree).

Having repoman report 0 (or few) QA issues will become a pre-requisite
to getting the ebuilds into the official source tree.  But feel free to
leave that to me - I have to learn how to use it anyway if I want to do
any gentoo commits.

well it's after midnight...  I need to get the 0.11 ebuilds in before I
fall asleep... No more from me for now :)

thanks,
-- 
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>

Cubert: "Robots are very good at keeping secrets." 
Bender: "No, we're not, you little bed-wetter. Oops, I'm sorry." 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel

Reply via email to