-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Ellis wrote: | On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Jonny Lamb wrote: |> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:12:24AM +0100, Tejas Guruswamy wrote: |> One thing: your trunk/COPYING says GPLv2, but your Google Code front page |> says MIT. The former will take precedence, but after reading the front |> page, I'm wondering whether you deliberately put the GPL in your |> COPYING? Please make the license very clear upon importing into our SVN. |> |>> I assume trunk/kde4-kio_rapip is OK as far as the naming goes. |> I prefer trunk/kde4-kio-rapip to be honest, but if you are stuck on that |> name, then go ahead. |> | | Can I suggest renaming kio-rapip to kio-rapip-kde3, and making kde4 the | standard kio-rapip ? I don't really do kde, but I get the impression | kde3 is now a bit old. |
So what's the decision on the naming and licensing issues? Should I wait for a consensus or go ahead and do a checkin? At this point both kde3 and kde4 are widely used. Maybe just rename them both to avoid any confusion. Also has anyone gotten the chance to test it on their machines? Tejas Guruswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIb08FYG2jpJEwRyoRAiNlAKCTEPm7AtRgfjdaC8pWSy8C5No5OQCdE3Ee KFiB++OGwx+9ujFiicHISGQ= =13VH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
