On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 21:45 +0100, Mark Ellis wrote: > Ok, whoa :) > > I was all ready to start a 'kernel status' thread, and the train went > without me. Don't get me wrong, this is good, but is there anything else > we want to submit to the kernel guys ? Considering how long it took to > get to the stage we're at, it's worth thinking it through first. > > I intended to have a good look through usb-rndis-lite and compare it to > the latest kernel before we had this discussion, but hey. > > To my knowledge, and the quick browse I had, we don't have anything in > usbnet and cdc_ether that needs to be submitted. > > In rndis_host, obviously there is the subject of this thread, but has > the Samsung timeout patch been submitted? Anyone know of anything else ?
Doing it one thing at a time seems sane anyway. Submitting a big clump of stuff would likely result in some of it getting held up by debates about the other stuff. Tethering is a small, pretty safe (should be :>) patch which has been tested to work, so I think it's OK to submit it on its own. The other big thing that I know of is John's infamous 'dirty patch' that fixes -110 errors on certain devices (including several owned by MDV users). He wants to clean this up before submitting it upstream. He says he'll probably get time to work on this next week. That isn't even in usb-rndis-lite SVN head, though - it's still a separate patch. -- adamw ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
