On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:26:27 +0000 Mark Ellis <m...@mpellis.org.uk> wrote:
> Effectively, udev replaces hal. Of course, udev is a linuxism, and no > one seems to have put much thought into what happens on *BSD etc. Indeed. BSDs (at least FreeBSD) have devd daemon, it's able to trigger some events when devices are connected/disconected. But it's unable to assign any properties to them. It is designed in the UNIX way -- a tool like devd should notify the world about an event, but it shouldn't know what should be done when this event happens :-) As I know, hal is going to be replaced by "DeviceKit". Am I right that it's something tightly coupled with udev? -- Regards, Ilya Bakulin http://kibab.com xmpp://kibab...@jabber.ru
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
