On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 07:28 +0200, Ilya Bakulin wrote: > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:26:27 +0000 > Mark Ellis <m...@mpellis.org.uk> wrote: > > > Effectively, udev replaces hal. Of course, udev is a linuxism, and no > > one seems to have put much thought into what happens on *BSD etc. > > Indeed. BSDs (at least FreeBSD) have devd daemon, it's able to trigger some > events when devices are connected/disconected. But it's unable to assign any > properties to them. It is designed in the UNIX way -- a tool like devd should > notify the world about an event, but it shouldn't know what should be done > when this event happens :-) >
Ok, that sounds like udev, so that's good. Any idea how to hook something into devd ? > As I know, hal is going to be replaced by "DeviceKit". Am I right that it's > something tightly coupled with udev? > > For our purposes, DeviceKit is udev. Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
