On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 07:22 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote:
> On Thursday 08 April 2010 00:21:15 Mark Ellis wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 16:39 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > are there any other things that still need to be finished for a 0.15
> > > release? If not, what are the steps to get the 0.15 release actually out
> > > (at least in tar.gz form, later also packages for different distros)?
> > 
> > I think it's in a reasonable state, won't take long to check. Off the
> > top of my head, it won't be a fantastically exciting anyway :)
> 
> 
> Well, I know one thing: kpm at least has exciting new feature :)

Actually, I also really liked the way you get the picture of the device,
must do that in trayicon.

> 
> Btw, did you have any luck looking further into the synce-hal patched I 
> provided?

Further, yes :)

I meant to let you know, must've forgot. With the whole devkit thing as
well, it's looks better have a dbus (or hal) interface as soon as
possible in the process, which also works better for what your patch is
doing. It takes some serious reworking though, so I figured it made more
sense to put it after this release. When it's sorted you can help me
test the devkit interface and tweak synce-kpm to use it ....


> 
> Guido
> 
> 
> > 
> > > Guido
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 09:33 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>http://www.slideshare.net/leingang/lesson-20-optimization-handout
> > > >> as I said in my previous email, the easter weekend I had some spare
> > > >> time and
> > > >> as you can see from the commit logs, I implemented the remote registry
> > > >> viewer
> > > >> within KPM. At the moment it stays with simple remote registry viewer,
> > > >> because
> > > >> registry editor will take some more time, which might be next holidays
> > > >>
> > > >> :)
> > > >>
> > > >> So from my point of view I am ready for 0.15 release.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regarding new releases, is there a list of distros where we got
> > > >> through to the
> > > >> main packages? I know that for ubuntu we are not in the main distro,
> > > >> but via
> > > >> PPA it is relatively easy. As far as I can see, in Debian we still
> > > >> only have
> > > >> the 0.13-2 packages, which are a bit outdated.  What about the other
> > > >> distros?
> > > >
> > > > Good point, it would be nice to know who out there is providing
> > > > "official" packaging, and who is maintaining it. Jonny Lamb was doing
> > > > Debian, but haven't heard from him for ages.
> > > >
> > > >> Kind regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> Guido Diepen
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thursday 11 March 2010 08:30:51 Guido Diepen wrote:
> > > >> > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 21:41 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote:
> > > >> > >> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:37:06 Mark Ellis wrote:
> > > >> > >> > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 00:31 +0100, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > >> > >> > > Hey Mark,
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > I noticed you started tagging some 0.15 releases in Feb.
> > > >>
> > > >> What's the
> > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > plan for putting up the tarballs?
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > just curious :)
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > thanks,
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Wasn't really planning a release, just bumping them because
> > > >>
> > > >> changes
> > > >>
> > > >> > >> had
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > been made. Maybe I should ? I'll see what state we're in.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Mark
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Let me know when you come up with a possible date for 0.15. I
> > > >> > >> might
> > > >>
> > > >> have
> > > >>
> > > >> > >> some
> > > >> > >> time around Easter to work some more at the registry viewer
> > > >> > >> (editor
> > > >>
> > > >> will
> > > >>
> > > >> > >> take
> > > >> > >> me some more time ;) ) within KPM. If it could at least wait till
> > > >> > >> somewhere
> > > >> > >> after Easter that would give me some time to work on it.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Guido
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Sounds like a plan, cool, when is Easter this year ?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > First weekend of April.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > >------- ----- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> > > >> > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find
> > > >> > > bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel
> > > >> > > performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during
> > > >> > > beta.
> > > >> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev__________________________________
> > > >> > >_______ ______ SynCE-Devel mailing list
> > > >> > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >------- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> > > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______________________________________
> > > >________ SynCE-Devel mailing list
> > > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
> > 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel

Reply via email to