On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 07:22 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > On Thursday 08 April 2010 00:21:15 Mark Ellis wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 16:39 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > are there any other things that still need to be finished for a 0.15 > > > release? If not, what are the steps to get the 0.15 release actually out > > > (at least in tar.gz form, later also packages for different distros)? > > > > I think it's in a reasonable state, won't take long to check. Off the > > top of my head, it won't be a fantastically exciting anyway :) > > > Well, I know one thing: kpm at least has exciting new feature :)
Actually, I also really liked the way you get the picture of the device, must do that in trayicon. > > Btw, did you have any luck looking further into the synce-hal patched I > provided? Further, yes :) I meant to let you know, must've forgot. With the whole devkit thing as well, it's looks better have a dbus (or hal) interface as soon as possible in the process, which also works better for what your patch is doing. It takes some serious reworking though, so I figured it made more sense to put it after this release. When it's sorted you can help me test the devkit interface and tweak synce-kpm to use it .... > > Guido > > > > > > > Guido > > > > > > > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 09:33 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >>http://www.slideshare.net/leingang/lesson-20-optimization-handout > > > >> as I said in my previous email, the easter weekend I had some spare > > > >> time and > > > >> as you can see from the commit logs, I implemented the remote registry > > > >> viewer > > > >> within KPM. At the moment it stays with simple remote registry viewer, > > > >> because > > > >> registry editor will take some more time, which might be next holidays > > > >> > > > >> :) > > > >> > > > >> So from my point of view I am ready for 0.15 release. > > > >> > > > >> Regarding new releases, is there a list of distros where we got > > > >> through to the > > > >> main packages? I know that for ubuntu we are not in the main distro, > > > >> but via > > > >> PPA it is relatively easy. As far as I can see, in Debian we still > > > >> only have > > > >> the 0.13-2 packages, which are a bit outdated. What about the other > > > >> distros? > > > > > > > > Good point, it would be nice to know who out there is providing > > > > "official" packaging, and who is maintaining it. Jonny Lamb was doing > > > > Debian, but haven't heard from him for ages. > > > > > > > >> Kind regards, > > > >> > > > >> Guido Diepen > > > >> > > > >> On Thursday 11 March 2010 08:30:51 Guido Diepen wrote: > > > >> > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 21:41 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: > > > >> > >> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:37:06 Mark Ellis wrote: > > > >> > >> > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 00:31 +0100, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > > >> > >> > > Hey Mark, > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > I noticed you started tagging some 0.15 releases in Feb. > > > >> > > > >> What's the > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > plan for putting up the tarballs? > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > just curious :) > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > thanks, > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > Wasn't really planning a release, just bumping them because > > > >> > > > >> changes > > > >> > > > >> > >> had > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > been made. Maybe I should ? I'll see what state we're in. > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > Mark > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Let me know when you come up with a possible date for 0.15. I > > > >> > >> might > > > >> > > > >> have > > > >> > > > >> > >> some > > > >> > >> time around Easter to work some more at the registry viewer > > > >> > >> (editor > > > >> > > > >> will > > > >> > > > >> > >> take > > > >> > >> me some more time ;) ) within KPM. If it could at least wait till > > > >> > >> somewhere > > > >> > >> after Easter that would give me some time to work on it. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Guido > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Sounds like a plan, cool, when is Easter this year ? > > > >> > > > > >> > First weekend of April. > > > >> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> > >------- ----- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > > >> > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find > > > >> > > bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel > > > >> > > performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during > > > >> > > beta. > > > >> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev__________________________________ > > > >> > >_______ ______ SynCE-Devel mailing list > > > >> > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > >> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______________________________________ > > > >________ SynCE-Devel mailing list > > > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel