On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 09:07 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 07:22 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > >> On Thursday 08 April 2010 00:21:15 Mark Ellis wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 16:39 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > are there any other things that still need to be finished for a 0.15 > >> > > release? If not, what are the steps to get the 0.15 release actually > >> out > >> > > (at least in tar.gz form, later also packages for different > >> distros)? > >> > > >> > I think it's in a reasonable state, won't take long to check. Off the > >> > top of my head, it won't be a fantastically exciting anyway :) > >> > >> > >> Well, I know one thing: kpm at least has exciting new feature :) > > > > Actually, I also really liked the way you get the picture of the device, > > must do that in trayicon. > > I liked this feature also yes :)Very simple and small, but nice addition > to show :) > > So you will implement this into trayicon and then everything is ready for > 0.15 release? > >
Haven't really got time to fiddle with trayicon at the moment, I'll do a release as is very soon. > > > >> > >> Btw, did you have any luck looking further into the synce-hal patched I > >> provided? > > > > Further, yes :) > > > > I meant to let you know, must've forgot. With the whole devkit thing as > > well, it's looks better have a dbus (or hal) interface as soon as > > possible in the process, which also works better for what your patch is > > doing. It takes some serious reworking though, so I figured it made more > > sense to put it after this release. When it's sorted you can help me > > test the devkit interface and tweak synce-kpm to use it .... > > > This way it looks like it is easier to implement the patch in the dbus > interface indeed. Let me know whenever I can help out with that. > > Regarding the testing of the devkit stuff, can you run devkit at the same > time as the hal stuff? > Yes, in general. > Also, the other day on the IRC channel I ran into a person using latest > ubuntu beta (or alpha, don't know) and hald was not running on his system. > Does this mean that they already changed it for the upcoming release? > As I understand it, ubuntu lucid deprecates hal in favour of devkit/udev, and removes it from the boot sequence, so it's not running by default. It can be run manually, or a dbus signal should activate it. Unfortunately, just plugging in a synce device won't ! > Guido > > > > > > >> > >> Guido > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > Guido > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 09:33 +0200, Guido Diepen wrote: > >> > > >> Hi, > >> > > >>http://www.slideshare.net/leingang/lesson-20-optimization-handout > >> > > >> as I said in my previous email, the easter weekend I had some > >> spare > >> > > >> time and > >> > > >> as you can see from the commit logs, I implemented the remote > >> registry > >> > > >> viewer > >> > > >> within KPM. At the moment it stays with simple remote registry > >> viewer, > >> > > >> because > >> > > >> registry editor will take some more time, which might be next > >> holidays > >> > > >> > >> > > >> :) > >> > > >> > >> > > >> So from my point of view I am ready for 0.15 release. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Regarding new releases, is there a list of distros where we got > >> > > >> through to the > >> > > >> main packages? I know that for ubuntu we are not in the main > >> distro, > >> > > >> but via > >> > > >> PPA it is relatively easy. As far as I can see, in Debian we > >> still > >> > > >> only have > >> > > >> the 0.13-2 packages, which are a bit outdated. What about the > >> other > >> > > >> distros? > >> > > > > >> > > > Good point, it would be nice to know who out there is providing > >> > > > "official" packaging, and who is maintaining it. Jonny Lamb was > >> doing > >> > > > Debian, but haven't heard from him for ages. > >> > > > > >> > > >> Kind regards, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Guido Diepen > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Thursday 11 March 2010 08:30:51 Guido Diepen wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 21:41 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: > >> > > >> > >> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:37:06 Mark Ellis wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 00:31 +0100, Iain Buchanan wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > Hey Mark, > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > I noticed you started tagging some 0.15 releases in Feb. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> What's the > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > plan for putting up the tarballs? > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > just curious :) > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > thanks, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Wasn't really planning a release, just bumping them > >> because > >> > > >> > >> > > >> changes > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> had > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > been made. Maybe I should ? I'll see what state we're in. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Mark > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> Let me know when you come up with a possible date for 0.15. > >> I > >> > > >> > >> might > >> > > >> > >> > > >> have > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> some > >> > > >> > >> time around Easter to work some more at the registry viewer > >> > > >> > >> (editor > >> > > >> > >> > > >> will > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> take > >> > > >> > >> me some more time ;) ) within KPM. If it could at least wait > >> till > >> > > >> > >> somewhere > >> > > >> > >> after Easter that would give me some time to work on it. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> Guido > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Sounds like a plan, cool, when is Easter this year ? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > First weekend of April. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > > >> > >------- ----- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > >> > > >> > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, > >> find > >> > > >> > > bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel > >> > > >> > > performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks > >> during > >> > > >> > > beta. > >> > > >> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev__________________________________ > >> > > >> > >_______ ______ SynCE-Devel mailing list > >> > > >> > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> > > >> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel > >> > > > > >> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >------- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > >> > > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find > >> bugs > >> > > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > >> > > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > >> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______________________________________ > >> > > >________ SynCE-Devel mailing list > >> > > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel > >> > > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______________________________________________ > > SynCE-Devel mailing list > > SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
