http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5188
--- Comment #19 from Chen Congwu <[email protected]> 2009-11-14 06:31:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #18) >Regarding the immediate flushing: this is kind of inefficient when adding >single entries to the mapping. As a short-term solution it is okay, but I'd >like to have an issue opened that reminds us of improving this. See issue 8022 > (In reply to comment #17) > > I suggest you file an issue for this, with low priority. We only need a > solution once talking to originators of such a SAN becomes relevant. See issue 8021 > For libsyncml/OpenSync, did you find some other solution? Do you mean the SAN problem? I just checked they should support SAN 1.2, but not tested. Any way, the original workaround which ignores the SAN package and start syncing with a predefined configuration is not needed at all. Is this something we need to carry out - interoperability with OpenSync? Server or Client? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. _______________________________________________ Syncevolution-issues mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution-issues
