On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 16:18 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 15:57:53 +0800, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote: > > Hi, Tino > > I can verify your finding. Below bug entry is used to track this issue. > > http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10458 > > You could track this issue to find the latest information. > > thank you for raising this question. > > Thanks for caring about this. I think a solution could be to always > create an ACTION of type DISPLAY,
That's what we do now. I just merge Yongsheng's patch. > with the DESCRIPTION set to the > SUMMARY of the VEVENT. That is a potential gap in SyncEvolution: it doesn't have "alarm descriptions" and thus creates/stores slightly invalid iCalendar 2.0 VALARMs without the obligatory DESCRIPTION. I'm not sure whether this really is a problem in practice. Evolution doesn't seem to care I assume, otherwise we would expect to have had bug reports about it before, which is not the case. I'm not sure whether the problem is solved entirely with Mobical.net, though. In a simple, relative alarm (15 minutes before event), this was sent to the server: BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:1.0 TZ:+01:00 DAYLIGHT;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:TRUE;+02;20110327T010000Z;20101031T010000Z;;freeassociation.sourceforge.net;Tzfile;Europe;Berlin BEGIN:VEVENT LAST-MODIFIED:20100401T161612Z DCREATED:20100401T161612Z CLASS:PUBLIC SUMMARY:custom alarm DESCRIPTION:custom alarm DTSTART:20100401T103000Z DTEND:20100401T110000Z AALARM:-PT15M;;;custom alarm DALARM:-PT15M;;;custom alarm END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR This came back: BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:1.0 BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20100401T103000Z DTEND:20100401T110000Z SUMMARY:custom alarm DESCRIPTION:custom alarm LAST-MODIFIED:20100401T161623Z END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR No alarm. Yongsheng, can you investigate further? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
