Hello everyone, I'm testing the Syncevolution 1.0 beta 2 (I haven't had a chance to grab beta 3 yet) using the scratchbox emulator environment, preparing to trust data to it.
My intent is to run the sync evolution client on an N900 and syncevolution HTTP server on my desktop. The HTTP Server Howto on the wiki says that the HTTP server is not the intended use case and that the Bluetooth sync direct is the more well tested scenario. In what way is it more well tested? I see there are about 450 CPPUnit tests...very nice. Are all the same tests that are run for Bluetooth sync testing also run for the HTTP server sync scenario? As I understand it the key differences in the two scenarios are the HTTP server written in python (it's code looks concise and clean) and the evolution dbus server (also used in the Bluetooth scenario?). Am I correct? Anything else I should be considering in my evaluation? --Jeff _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
