On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 21:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 23:12 +0100, Jeffrey Perry wrote: > > My intent is to run the sync evolution client on an N900 and > > syncevolution HTTP server on my desktop. > > > > The HTTP Server Howto on the wiki says that the HTTP server is not the > > intended use case and that the Bluetooth sync direct is the more well > > tested scenario. > > > > In what way is it more well tested? > > Intel QA runs tests with Bluetooth sync. They don't test the HTTP > server. We (= developers) could and should test the SyncEvolution HTTP > server like we do with other SyncML servers in the nightly testing, but > we haven't set that up yet. >
When the HTTP server configuration is tested, which tests are run? My intent is to avoid testing manually anything you may have covered with automated tests, > > I see there are about 450 CPPUnit tests...very nice. > > I'm not sure how you counted those. What we have and use a lot is the > automated testing of SyncEvolution as client with various third-party > HTTP SyncML servers. > The readme says to run client-test with no params to get a list of tests... I piped it to wc -l and learned that there are about 450 tests listed.. > > Are all the same tests that are run for Bluetooth sync testing > > also run for the HTTP server sync scenario? > > Not yet. The same tests could be used for both, but they need be > parameterized differently (many phones are too dumb to handle the same > data as SyncML servers). I'm also not sure how to integrate phone > testing with the nightly test runs - place all phones next to the server > in the machine room?! Not possible right now, with the server in a > remote location ;-} > Sounds like you can run all the phone client tests against the HTTP server. Do you do this ? _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
