On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:57 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:24 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 23:01 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> Any reason why there's not a source tar ball to go with the binary > >> >> releases? > >> > > >> > Ah, caught guilty. The only reason is that I didn't bother, because > >> > anyone interested in source code at this point is better of pulling > >> > directly from the "master" branches in the git repos. > >> > > >> > But now there's also a .tar.gz. > >> > >> I maybe going blind as I still don't see one there. > > > > http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/sources/syncevolution-1.0.99.6.tar.gz > > Thanks! To compile on Fedora 13 and later I need the following patch > to compile it
[gtk+-2.0 added to PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBNOTIFY...] On Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libnotify.pc contains a "Requires: gtk-2.0" part. That is the correct solution to the problem. Is there a chance to get that fixed in Fedora soonish? Otherwise I'll apply the patch as a work around. > and the -gtk.desktop file is missing a ';' at the end of > the category field. Oh, thanks for pointing that out. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
