On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:57 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:24 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 23:01 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> Any reason why there's not a source tar ball to go with the binary >> >> >> releases? >> >> > >> >> > Ah, caught guilty. The only reason is that I didn't bother, because >> >> > anyone interested in source code at this point is better of pulling >> >> > directly from the "master" branches in the git repos. >> >> > >> >> > But now there's also a .tar.gz. >> >> >> >> I maybe going blind as I still don't see one there. >> > >> > http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/sources/syncevolution-1.0.99.6.tar.gz >> >> Thanks! To compile on Fedora 13 and later I need the following patch >> to compile it > > [gtk+-2.0 added to PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBNOTIFY...] > > On Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libnotify.pc contains a "Requires: > gtk-2.0" part. That is the correct solution to the problem. Is there a > chance to get that fixed in Fedora soonish? Otherwise I'll apply the > patch as a work around.
We already require gtk2 in Fedora. This started to break with the introduction of gtk3. Apparently from gnome upstream the patch is the proper way to fix it (according to upstream) with the introduction of gtk3. >> and the -gtk.desktop file is missing a ';' at the end of >> the category field. > > Oh, thanks for pointing that out No probs. Peter _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
