[dropping OpenSync list, as discussed there]

On Di, 2011-01-04 at 17:12 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> I think an important foot note is the question which goals the projects
> have. I am personally (as IT manager of a university) see three general
> needs in terms of synchronization:
> 
> 1. a groupware server (with Active Sync support)
> 2. a sync solution on mobile devices (for Linux mobiles)
> 3. a local desktop solution to backup devices
[4. bridge mode: device to desktop to server]

Agreed.

> The first need is not the goal of OpenSync and SyncEvolution. The third
> need is the goal of both solutions. So the question is which priority
> have the other needs? Which general design ideas like plugins, engines,
> formats or peer-to-peer exist and how does they perform in the different
> use cases?
> 
> Disclaimer: The following answers just represent my actual limited
> knowledge ;)
> 
> 1.) SyncEvolution explicitly targets the second need.

Not exclusively. Targeting the third case, local desktop sync, was an
explicit goal for SyncEvolution 1.0 in Moblin. There's still a need for
it, and most of the recent work on the stable branch went into that
area.

> 2.) SyncEvolution can handle the fourth need but I think this was not
> the usage which the developers have in mind.

Agreed. It only works if the mobile device always syncs with the server
via the desktop, which defeats the purpose of a mobile device.

> I know that usually such discussions are off list but a mailing list is
> a good archiving and transparent method. I hope you can accept this.

I certainly do, but not everyone was happy about the discussion, so now
I am focusing only on the SyncEvolution part here.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to