On Di, 2011-01-25 at 15:56 +0000, Giancarlo wrote:
> there are a couple of projects related to syncevolution which are being 
> recently
> developed.
> 
> The guys who are taking care of the projects are brilliant but a little shy 
> and
> did not advertise their work until now, so I decided to push them a little 
> bit.

That's good news, thanks for sharing.

> The first project deals with exploiting syncevolution to sync a number of pc's
> and cell phones in a seamless and usable way. In other words it is aimed at
> efficiently and easily using syncevolution server. 
> http://code.google.com/p/pim-synchronization/
> Patrick already answered some questions from the developers of the project.

Good that had the time to reply ;-} Typically I try to treat all
questions with the same amount of attention, but when I am busy there
may be delays. In that case it does help to explain a bit why questions
are asked and introduce yourself, because projects working with
SyncEvolution definitely deserve a bit of extra care.

> The second project deals with adding versioning capabilities to 
> synchronization
> engines for both pc and phones. It is very interesting as it uses svn and 
> other
> packages to produce an easy to use and efficient server:
> http://code.google.com/p/versionsync/

I never tried it, but with the file backend that should indeed be very
easy and efficient to do. Just archive the whole directory and restore
individual files as needed. Restoring also the original time stamp would
be better than setting the current time, because then clients which
still have that restored item do not need to pull it again, but this is
a minor optimization.


-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to