On Mo, 2011-01-31 at 10:49 +0000, Ville Nummela wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:28 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Mo, 2011-01-31 at 05:23 +0000, Ville Nummela wrote: > > > There are also my changes for the sync-ui, which add the possibility to > > > change the sync interval from the gui. > > That one is a bit more problematic. Do we really want to expose the user > > to the internal text format? Some kind of slider would be better IMHO. > > The empty string field also doesn't tell the user that there is already > > a default set, so it looks like he has to choose something, without any > > guidance. The original issue wasn't so much about "let users choose an > > interval" but "provide feedback on how auto sync works"; following that > > logic, showing the default would be more important then letting the user > > override it. > > I understand your points. My changes were just something I did for > myself, as I don't want to edit the config files every time I change the > interval for testing purposes. I'm not an usability expert, so creating > good UIs is difficult for me.
Same with me. > I someone tells me exactly what the UI > should do, I can probably code it. I can see whether our designers have an idea. I wouldn't hold my breath for too long, though, it might take a while. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
