On Fr, 2011-06-17 at 09:13 +0100, Salvatore Iovene wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:40:07 +0200 > Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Translating the 404 error into 401 is too aggressive. It should only > > be done if the path for which the error was triggered really was the > > one where %u was substituted. > > do you mean any path that includes the username or just the path that > we access for the first time AND it includes the username?
"first time" and "includes the username". Once we have identified correct credentials and the corresponding path, reporting 401 would just be confusing. IMHO, of course. Google itself even has it in their help pages somewhere that credentials may have to be entered multiple times although they were correct. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
