On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 09:53 -0700, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 17:37 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote: > > > Attached is a patch which might solve the problem. It passes all of my > > > tests here, but I don't have a setup where the code is relevant. Please > > > let me know if it works for you. > > > > Well, didn't seem to work correctly, I sent logs in separate mail. > > The patch did update the UID, but it set an empty value. This might be > due to a different bug that I introduced recently in the whole > UID/revision string tracking. I'm not at all happy with the solution > that I arrived at now. I'll probably rip it out and replace it with > something simpler. May I ask you to try again in a day or two?
Trying again with a recent commit like 62239e5c9 would be worthwhile. That has all of the enhancements and passed all tests. In the meantime stabilizing and testing continues, so there's still no 1.2 release candidate yet. Current focus is on the D-Bus server, which shouldn't affect you. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
