On Sa, 2011-07-16 at 01:02 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote: > Den 11. juli 2011 14:30, skrev Patrick Ohly: > >>> I don't have a configuration mechanism in place for this yet. In the > >>> meantime, can you perhaps patch SyncContext.cpp and comment out the > >>> following code on Maemo 5? > >> > >> "Patch and comment out"... is the patch to comment this out, or did you > >> mean something else by "patch"? > > > > The patch would be to comment this out. > > OK. I've tried that. (Apparently you released 1.1.99.5 in the meantime > so I updated to that at the same time.) After building that, an > attempted normal sync failed to update some stuff because entries were > not found or something. Presuming that was expected to happen because of > the change in tracking mechanism,
I think your previous version was already based on that revised tracking mechanism. If you still have the logs of that failed normal sync, then I'd like to have a look to determine why it failed. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
