On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:36 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote: > It seems to me as if we've got 2 choices right now... > > 1) Postpone this and wait till we can bump the requirement to GLib >= > 2.26 to do this work. > 2) Go forward with this and use it when ./configure detects an > adequate GLib version. > > I'm thinking the second option sounds like the way to go. Let me know > your opinions on this.
I agree. It'll allow me to continue providing binaries for a wider variety of Linux systems on syncevolution.org and make distribution packagers happy because they can ignore the in-tree copy of the Bluez gdbus. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
