On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:36 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote: >> It seems to me as if we've got 2 choices right now... >> >> 1) Postpone this and wait till we can bump the requirement to GLib >= >> 2.26 to do this work. >> 2) Go forward with this and use it when ./configure detects an >> adequate GLib version. >> >> I'm thinking the second option sounds like the way to go. Let me know >> your opinions on this. > > I agree. It'll allow me to continue providing binaries for a wider > variety of Linux systems on syncevolution.org and make distribution > packagers happy because they can ignore the in-tree copy of the Bluez > gdbus. >
Ok, I'll branch a gio-gdbus branch off my dbus-server-reorg branch. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
