2011/8/31 Patrick Ohly <[email protected]>:
> On Di, 2011-08-30 at 15:05 +0200, Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
>> I also added a warnings system like described in [1]. It may be useful.
>> [1] 
>> http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2011/01/18/avoiding-use-of-deprecated-api/
>
> Yes, sounds useful. In the nightly testing I add "-Werror -Wall" to the
> CXXFLAGS/CFLAGS on the command line, but this --enable-warnings=fatal is
> nicer.
>
> Ah, minor caveat: libsynthesis doesn't support it yet. So at the moment,
> the explicit flags are still needed when compiling both at the same
> time.
>
>> Again, I'm attaching a complete patch made against
>> dbus-server-reorganization branch.
>
> I've fast-forwarded "master" to your autotools-cleanup-2 branch this
> morning and started testing it, after fixing the ActiveSync backend and
> runtests.py (invoked make in the wrong directories/with wrong targets).
> Works fine so far.
>
> In the meantime you also made a similar change for ActiveSync. I think
> I'll stay with my version because a) it doesn't add the
> --export-dynamic, which no longer seems to be necessary (if it ever was)
> and b) it doesn't include an unrelated change to addressbook.am.

and c) it does add README file into distribution.

And that change in addressbook.am was removing a leftover from old
build system (there are no separate Makefiles anymore), so maybe
you'll want to remove it sometime later.

>
> But you are right about SYNCEVO_WFLAGS and wrapping AS_HELP_STRING(),
> will fix that.
>
> --
> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>
> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to