On Do, 2012-01-05 at 16:55 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > As far as I can tell, this patch should be applied. Or is there some > reason to compile the code in dbus/ if --enable-dbus-service is not > used?
For a while I compiled sync-ui and core SyncEvolution separately in MeeGo. In that case, D-Bus service is disabled and dbus/glib needs to be compiled. In other words, decoupling dbus compilation from D-Bus service compilation makes sense. But probably some of the current checks for what needs to be compiled inside dbus are not quite correct, because there is no real "enable/disable D-Bus" switch in configure. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
