On Fr, 2011-09-02 at 09:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > Is there any reason to refer to "peers" here instead of "services"? > http://syncevolution.org/documentation/compatibility
Peers also includes things like mobile phones, services doesn't. That's the main reason. Feel free to make this more readable. That such peers work is not documented well (ehem, at all?) on the page, though. There is only the Wiki pages side bar which lists pages tagged appropriately. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
