On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:25 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Fr, 2011-09-02 at 09:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > Is there any reason to refer to "peers" here instead of "services"? > > http://syncevolution.org/documentation/compatibility > > Peers also includes things like mobile phones, services doesn't. That's > the main reason. Feel free to make this more readable. > > That such peers work is not documented well (ehem, at all?) on the page, > though. There is only the Wiki pages side bar which lists pages tagged > appropriately.
And what does it mean by "indirectly" synchronizing data? Is that something people are likely to be interested in? -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
