On Mi, 2012-01-11 at 14:59 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: > This will very much be an issue with GIO GDBus as it uses the same > mechanism. Looking that the souce of libdbus and gdbus leads me to > believe using signals on a non-bus connection doesn't really make > sense. I just use method calls in this case.
Indeed, registering signal subscribers isn't very useful when there is always exactly one recipient. Support for one-way method invocations (= don't care about return value) would be almost identical to such a signal. We don't support those at the moment, as far as I remember: the caller must use synchronous method calls (which wait for a result) or use asynchronous with callback. It could use a callback which doesn't do anything. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
