On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 14:15 +0100, Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
> If I remember correctly then we have dbus_get_connection_fd() function
> that gets a connection pointer. In bluez wrapper connection pointer is
> marked as DBusConnection and in GIO GDBus wrapper it is
> GDBusConnection. But C++ intrusive pointer for them is
> DBusConnectionPtr, so I decided then to change getConnection() methods
> to return C++ pointer to have single name. I suppose I needed that
> when I was updating GIO GDBus wrapper to bluez wrapper state. I guess
> we need neither dbus_get_connection_fd() nor getConnection() returning
> C++ pointer, so if I were you then I would just get rid of this
> commit.

Right, I'll do. I think dbus_get_connection_fd() also became obsolete.

>  Sorry for being vague, but my memory on it already blurred. :)

I know exactly what you mean ;-) That's why I write detailed commit
messages, because I know that I cannot rely on my memory.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to