On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 16:41 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've already finished an initial draft of the idea. Here's the commit > > (applies on top of the code which uses the blocking call operator). Does > > this look right? > > > > Btw, Krzesimir is working on getting these changes integrated.
Okay, then I'll let it stand as it is now. FYI, I finished integrating the GDBus C++ changes into master. A rebased branch with your code and my partial asynchronous proxy class is in the cssr1-pohly branch. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
