On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:28 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Patrick, i have also another question: > > in case this other sync option, lets call it "add from server", is not > possible/going to be added, does syncevolution support > groups/categories for other protocols than syncml?
Not yet. In that case the logic that you would like to have is easier to implement, because SyncEvolution and not the server decide which items on the server are part of a sync. But wait a second. Do you want the filtering to happen on the server or on the N9? Client-side filtering would be possible also with SyncML. > I dont know, like webdav with a private funambol server? SyncEvolution supports CardDAV, but not the Funambol server, at least as far as I know. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
