On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:43 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: > We've now got the GIO GDBus issues fixed and all the non-autosync & > non-connection tests pass with both DBus wrappers. We are currently > going through the code and making sure code is commented properly, > debugging output is cleaned up and header files are organized more > cleanly.
Can you rebase it onto for-master/new-master or even for-master/platform-modules? I'm currently running a quick test and will bump master up to for-master/new-master once that is done. for-master/platform-modules is a bit more difficult because it includes some code refactoring which affects the src/dbus/server sources. I expect conflicts. I don't want to delay your work, but it's likely that the for-master/platform-modules will go in first. Perhaps you can have a look whether the changes in for-master/platform-modules make sense while you are rebasing? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
