On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Chris Kühl <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 17:18 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 16:54 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: >>> >> Now that you've merged for-master/new-master into master we are >>> >> rebasing onto master. >>> > >>> > How is that going? >>> > >>> >>> It's been rebased and we've squashed the changes into about a dozen >>> commits. The tests seem to give us the same results as before the >>> rebase. See the concurrent-sync-sessions-rebased-pre-cleanup branch >>> for the rebased and squashed changes. I'm putting the final touches on >>> the cleanup know. >> >> 057a19f18c600fe4158fd06087aed10b44f20c4e >>
<snip> >> Note that there is already a GetEnv() in util.h which returns an empty >> std::string when getenv() returns NULL. >> > > Thanks, I wasn't aware. I'll change it to use that. > Hmm, upon inspection I don't actually see this. I only see getEnv() which returns a char*. I can simply use getenv, though. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
