On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:52 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 18:58 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 17:18 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> >> > 6c9a05a9db72f001d9834d2d24ac589f48fc5798
>> >> >
>> >> >    dbus-server: Run sync sessions in separate processes
>> >> >
>> >> > ...
>> >> >
>> >> >    Sessions are separated into SessionResource and Session classes. A
>> >> >    SessionResource instance resides in the server process and serves as 
>> >> > a
>> >> >    proxy to the Session instance which is in the child process.
>> >> >
>> >> > This naming seems rather arbitrary to me. Why call it "Resource" and not
>> >> > something like "Stub" or "Proxy"?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, I'm not 100% happy with the naming either. They are subclasses
>> >> of Resource so it was the obvious choice. Renaming is not a problem
>> >> but I'd rather get finished with the more substantive changes needed
>> >> to complete this before doing that.
>> >
>> > Everything that minimizes the number of changes that I need to look at
>> > helps.
>> >
>>
>> It actually increased the changed line count. :(
>
> I can see how it might do that. But it did reduce the number of chunks
> from 152 to 130.
>

Yeah, the session and connection files in the helper are quite a bit
larger than those in the server.

>> I've gone ahead and done the renaming as well as all the other changes
>> you've requested except for moving the helper files into a
>> subdirectory. I've pushed them to a new
>> concurrent-sync-sessions-for-review branch[1].
>>
>> As mentioned above renaming has increased the changed line count. I've
>> got a branch with all the changes minus the renaming if you'd rather
>> have that.
>
> Please push it, I'll have a look.
>

Done. It's named concurrent-sync-sessions-for-review-before-rename[1].

Cheers,
chris

[1] 
https://meego.gitorious.org/meego-middleware/syncevolution/commits/concurrent-sync-sessions-for-review-before-rename
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to