On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:17 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote: > What made you choose to use time-based change tracking in KCalExtended > if you don't like it?
The backend started as a skunk work project to work with and verify the calendar API in MeeGo at a time when SyncEvolution wasn't the official sync solution for MeeGo. Because the native sync solution was using time-based change tracking, it made sense to test that. I never got around to changing it later. It wasn't relevant until you picked it up for the N9 port of SyncEvolution. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
