On 08. aug. 2012 10:48, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:17 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote: >> What made you choose to use time-based change tracking in KCalExtended >> if you don't like it? > > The backend started as a skunk work project to work with and verify the > calendar API in MeeGo at a time when SyncEvolution wasn't the official > sync solution for MeeGo. Because the native sync solution was using > time-based change tracking, it made sense to test that. > > I never got around to changing it later. It wasn't relevant until you > picked it up for the N9 port of SyncEvolution.
Right. Do you think it's best if I look at converting it to TrackingSyncSource? _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
