On 15.10.2012 21:43:55, Patrick Ohly wrote:
You did get me thinking :-)

        Hi, Patrick,
I am sorry this discussion had no continuation, that's mainly because it was powered by the first impression.

Aiming to simplify a thing for users, first, it is not always possible. Some things are quite complicated by their nature (and for SyncEvo it starts somewhere in SyncML). Then it's probably worth having another program as a "presentation" which is easier to understand and use which uses the original program.

(This isn't, again, the finished thought.)

I just wanted to thank you for being open to discussion and calm answers to stupid questions.

Best regards,
--
Ildar Mulyukov,  free SW designer/programmer
================================================
email: [email protected]
blog: http://johan-notes.blogspot.com/
ALT Linux Sisyphus
================================================
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to