On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 14:45 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
>  > b. For syncevolution cmdline tool: Move it from the @<context> part
> to a
>  > --profile <profile name>. Again, for clear understanding.
>  >
>  > What do ya think?
> 
> I don't like this either. I prefer commandlines to be short. And if 
> you're able to think of a context as a domain, then the @ notation
> makes quite a bit of sense. Like an email address. 

FWIW, that was also my thinking when introducing contexts and the
notation for them.

Other reasons:
      * Consistency between output and command line usage.
      * Backward compatibility for the commmand line: tools which
        treated a config name as an opaque string continued to work
        unchanged.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to