Hi All,

Any pointers on this? I went through the syntesis documents, they dont
mention how to add these.

Regards


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Sachin Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> One more query, though i feel you gave the answer already :(
>
> I need to add the EXT capability to teh client:
>
>   <Ext>
>     <XNam>SynchronizeGroup</XNam>
>     <XVal>X-CT</XVal>
>   </Ext>
>
> This comes after the closing of datastores. How to i enable this?
>
> Regards
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sachin Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am more concerned about the fields with tel:work fields.  Server has these
>> numbers saved as cell and fax. If client has no support for this as is
>> evident in the outgoing devinfo, the client vcard shoiluld not be storing
>> these and should be discarded by client.  Is it not so?
>>
>> I have only modified the 01card. Profile.xml
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2013 12:32 AM, "Patrick Ohly" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 23:49 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote:
>>> > Thanks Patrick.
>>> >
>>> > Yes i am using file storage and am modifying the 01card-profile.xml.
>>> >
>>> > However, i am facing an issue with its modification.
>>> > I removed all the telephone tags except for home and work.
>>> [...]
>>> > I am not sure why the client TEL details are coming this way.
>>> >
>>> > TEL;TYPE=HOME,VOICE:9
>>> > TEL;TYPE=HOME:6
>>> > TEL;TYPE=HOME:7
>>> > TEL:1
>>> > TEL;TYPE=WORK,VOICE:8
>>> >
>>> > I was expecting that the client should have had only the HOME and WORK
>>> > number.
>>> > Is my expectation wrong?
>>>
>>> I am not sure how thoroughly you removed the references to VOICE. For
>>> example, there are some scripts which add back the VOICE flag. You can
>>> debug this by running with "loglevel=4" and looking at the resulting
>>> syncevolution-log.html file of the sync. It will contain detailed
>>> descriptions of incoming data and its transformation.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>>>
>>> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
>>> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
>>> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
>>> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to